plan for tomorrow's irc-support-sig meeting (2010-08-19)

[dj johnson]

When you wanted to +op someone that is fully capable of being an op and has
a clue - I had no objection.

However, when you started in with the complete neophytes as possible next
+op candidates, I asked why ... Received no answer other than "read the
emails" to which I have in fact, been reading.  My only conclusion is that
you are feebly attempting to make some diluted point about something.

In point of fact, when I asked directly about it yesterday -- your objection
was not with the recent nomination at all, but rather with the timing of the
event.  You had said that you would prefer some solution for tickets other
than what we have available.  Fine, I get this point.  No problem here.  I
am currently at a loss for how to adequately resolve this issue to your
satisfaction.  Suggestions on this subject are welcome.

Try to keep your argument to something constructive and meaningful - for the
betterment of the community.

Suggesting +op candidates (two) that are clearly incapable of even basic
functions, such as "ln -s" (true story!) is not going to make the community
better, and only serves to ignite flames.

Please feel free to clarify what you meant, because I may have misunderstood
your point.

 -dj



On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen <bob at fedoraunity.org>wrote:

>
> ----- "Kevin Fenzi" <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> >
> > I would rephase that as: "who can nominate someone as a #fedora op".
> > Should we allow self nominations?
> > Should it be only any existing #fedora op?
> > Should it be more than one existing #fedora op?
> >
> > We can add this to the meeting next week...
> >
>
> This is a simple effort it would appear to eliminate a few ops from having
> a voice because I am willing to be a "trouble maker" or "asshole" or "dink"
> or "troll" or "illogical", these are the names I have been called since this
> issue and the #fedora users I choose to nominate have come up. I am not
> sorry that I feel those that are perhaps not the "favorite sons" may be good
> ops and good to have involved in establishing the ops feedback process. I do
> not feel that we should be adding ops mid stream of that task, this should
> not however prevent us from aligning added ops for once that process is
> complete.
>
> -- Bob
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> |       Robert 'Bob' Jensen        ||       Fedora Unity Founder       |
> |       bob at fedoraunity.org        ||      http://fedoraunity.org/     |
> |                   http://bjensen.fedorapeople.org/                   |
> |                http://blogs.fedoraunity.org/bobjensen                |
> |                   http://www.facebook.com/rpjensen                   |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> irc-support-sig mailing list
> irc-support-sig at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/irc-support-sig
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/irc-support-sig/attachments/20100820/7de7dc77/attachment.html