Digikam 2 for Fedora 14?

[Dariusz J. Garbowski]

On 10/09/11 03:25 AM, José Matos wrote:
> On 09/10/2011 01:43 AM, Dariusz J. Garbowski wrote:
>> Thanks for detailed answer. I was hoping this might just be the case of building the package but the
>> case being as it is I see why it's a pain to do staying compliant with Fedora policies.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dariusz
>
> I can understand your frustration but IMHO the sentence above is unfair.
>
> If any package was allowed to bundle any library can you imagine what
> would be the maintenance burden?
>
> Since the developers time is limited there are trade-offs to be done and
> the priority was to stabilise the changes in kde-4.7 since the packages
> framework behind has changed.

Hi Jose,

Maybe I wasn't clear enough -- what I was trying to say in my post is that I completely understand 
the reasons and accept them. :-)

Cheers,
Dariusz