Future kernel version number for F-15

Josh Stone jistone at redhat.com
Fri Jan 13 02:11:54 UTC 2012


On 01/11/2012 06:27 PM, Nicolas ViƩville wrote:
>> Didn't Chuck change it so LINUX_VERSION_CODE always calls itself 3.x
>> now?  If so, then you shouldn't need any cpp to consider 2.6.4x, as
>> that's only for the utsname.
> 
> If I understand correctly what you mean, this macro (on one line)
> 
> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(3, 2, 0) || (LINUX_VERSION_CODE
>> = KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 42) && LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3, 0,
> 0))
> 
> would be equivalent and have the same behavior of this one
> 
> #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(3, 2, 0)
> 
> in F-15 as in F-16?

Yes, that should work.  That change was made starting in the 2.6.41.3-1
package to leave LINUX_VERSION_CODE as the real 3.x version.



More information about the kernel mailing list