Future kernel version number for F-15

[Dave Jones]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 09:11:54PM -0500, Josh Stone wrote:
 > On 01/11/2012 06:27 PM, Nicolas Viéville wrote:
 > >> Didn't Chuck change it so LINUX_VERSION_CODE always calls itself 3.x
 > >> now?  If so, then you shouldn't need any cpp to consider 2.6.4x, as
 > >> that's only for the utsname.
 > > 
 > > If I understand correctly what you mean, this macro (on one line)
 > > 
 > > #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(3, 2, 0) || (LINUX_VERSION_CODE
 > >> = KERNEL_VERSION(2, 6, 42) && LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(3, 0,
 > > 0))
 > > 
 > > would be equivalent and have the same behavior of this one
 > > 
 > > #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(3, 2, 0)
 > > 
 > > in F-15 as in F-16?
 > 
 > Yes, that should work.  That change was made starting in the 2.6.41.3-1
 > package to leave LINUX_VERSION_CODE as the real 3.x version.

Right. If this doesn't work, let us know.

	Dave