[Fedora-legal-list] Re: dcraw.c licensing ambiguity

[Tom "spot" Callaway]

On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 10:31 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:

> I'm not a lawyer ;-), but the source code provisions in the GPL are a
> bit complicated -- to stay compatible, one would have to formulate
> something compatible to 32 lines of legalese in the GPL license ;-). I
> don't know about your customers, but I think an easy way to stay
> compatible to the GPL would be dual-licensing

Agreed. Dual licensing this code would make things a LOT easier for
Fedora.

~spot