[Fedora-legal-list] License tag for single binary built from multiple sources under different licenses

[Eric Smith]

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa at redhat.com> wrote:
> so we permit people to mark that package as simply "GPLv2+".
> However, it is also correct to list out all the licenses in play
> ("GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT"). It is left to the packager to determine
> which option they feel comfortable using.

Thanks for the clarification.  That makes perfect sense.

Eric