[Fedora-livecd-list] Pilgrim

[Greg Dekoenigsberg]

On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

> On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 18:07 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Ahm ed wrote:
>>> I'm not sure if I missed this discussion or not, but what is going to
>>> happen to kadischi now that pilgrim is the "default" or "chosen" tool
>>> for Fedora live-cd generation. Will this project contiue or will it
>>> merge with pungi and pilgrim.
>>
>> Pilgrim is being pursued for reasons outlined in
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraSummit/LiveCD. Anyone interested in
>> continuing to develop Kadischi can certainly do so. It is GPL'ed after
>> all. Consider it a merge otherwise.
>
> I walked away from the summit with the understanding that we were going
> to pursue integrating pilgrim and pungi for our official livecds.  But
> the Kadischi code would stay separate and Jaspar Hartline volunteered to
> be the maintainer which did not have any unfavorable reactions.  What
> piece of the discussion led you to think of it as a merge?  (I was only
> on IRC for this portion of things so I might have missed out on
> something.)
>
> It would be highly beneficial for Kadischi and pilgrim to remain
> unmerged.  They are two very different tools which aim to address two
> separate corners of the liveCD creation audience.

+1

I consider to see them as separate projects.  Pungi+Pilgrim will produce 
the "official" LiveCD.

--g

-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------