[Fedora-livecd-list] List of previous issues with livecd-tools which should be addressed

[Jasper Hartline]

This is a list of previous issues with livecd-tools
which Dhuff was working on or looking at.

>From what I can tell the first item in that list was committed, as was number 7.

Number 9 is irrelevant since we don't want to use a host's syslinux
files because
you don't want to for example be copying files from the host to the
target, if you're building Live images
which the host and target architectures don't match. For example
building a x86_64 LiveCD from
i686 host. (Which people say cannot be done, but it can by hardcoding
repo information in your kickstarts)
Also related, is that in F14 syslinux does not have a Perl dependency
anymore anyways.

Number 10 has been committed, in fact it was a duplicate of another
bug which is closed and committed.
Number 11 is the above number 10's duplicate.

Number 12 is a duplicate of another bug, but the other one has a patch
which is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604942


The rest still need to be reviewed and committed/or not.

Original Message:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/livecd/2010-May/005812.html

List:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/livecd/2010-May/005797.html
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587411
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/livecd/2010-April/005764.html
> Next two are related to post above
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448030
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582051
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/livecd/2010-April/005765.html
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583658
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/livecd/2010-March/005762.html
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/livecd/2010-March/005714.html
> (partially related to the syslinux perl issue I mentioned before)
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/livecd/2010-April/005768.html
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588622
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530308

Bruno, I see that there was one you said you would review over the
weekend over a month ago
but didn't update the bug report. If you need some assistance doing
testing and or rolling up changes
to get committed and packages rebuilt let me know, seems maybe you are
backed up by something.

If there is any other feedback people can provide that would be helpful also.