Zikula fasauth status

[David Nalley]

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Robyn Bergeron
<robyn.bergeron at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:34 PM, David Nalley <david at gnsa.us> wrote:
>> Simon stopped by in IRC today and worked with Mel on getting FASAuth
>> to properly use FAS groups for granting privileges. They tested this
>> successfully. I grabbed the changes and committed them to the git
>> repository and branched 0.3
>> I kicked off a new srpm which you can find here:
>> http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.3-1.fc13.src.rpm
>>
>> So action items from this:
>>
>> 1. We need to test that this RPM did in fact grab all of the changes
>> and that it works as it is supposed from the RPM.
>> 2. We need someone in sysadmin-main to look at commit the above
>> package to the infra repo.
>> 3. Mel - you can now take me off your nag list :)
>>
>> I'll try and participate in #1 in coordination with others, though it
>> may be the weekend before my schedule frees up enough to sink any
>> serious effort into it. If someone else wants to pick this up and run
>> with it, feel free to.
>>
>> Thoughts/comments/flames?
>
> Can either you or Mel make a ticket in the appropriate queue so we can
> track this in FI meetings as needed? (If you agree that it is
> necessary... I just don't want it to get lost.)

Ticket 109


> Is this fixing the admin FASauth issue or is this fixing the "we want
> editors to have their own fas group and get authorized to the same
> group in zikula" as well?
>

This fixes the 'editors having their own fas group and essentially get
authorization via fas in addition to authentication'