Question on Java apps
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Tue Mar 9 00:21:26 UTC 2010
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 06:39:08PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_13_Talking_Points&diff=155754&oldid=155751
> > Mark,
> > Good question you posted on the Talking points draft page on the
> > Fedora wiki. Unfortunately, we folks on the Marketing team are
> > writing these without specific domain knowledge about Java. Can you
> > provide some edits here that will help us better cover this particular
> > talking point, and why it's good for developers, without promoting
> > non-free software?
> So for reference the question posed is:
> Are technologies like glassfish/java 6 ee, javafx, etc. packaged for
> Fedora and actually Free Software?
> Glassfish is free software (GPL with classpath exception) - but I
> don't see it in Fedora repos.
I know that Java packaging is not trivial given the differences
between the way Java devs tend to do it, and the requirements set out
for Fedora packaging.
> Java 6 EE - well the text refers to the Java 6 EE spec, and what's
> left unsaid is that openJDK is what is meeting the spec. However most
> people assume that's java-1.6.0-sun when they see Java 6 EE.
How would you recommend restating this? Can you edit that talking
point to make it so?
> JavaFX SDK appears to not be F/LOSS
Right, mjw was noting this as well. I'm sending a copy of this email
to victorv who's listed as the netbeans maintainer, to get him to edit
this wiki page so that we are promoting only free software.
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com
More information about the marketing