Fedora Project em Português

[wonderer]

Nelson!

I read all of the conversation and I do not see any point of ongoing 
conversations on-list. PLEASE take that off the list!!!

You wrote yourself:
---

On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 17:10 +0200, Mario Torre wrote:

> >  Correct,
> >  
> >  I think this is Brasilian Portugues, isn't it?
>    
Objective isn't flaming. I don't know if it is pt_BR or anything else,
but I know Portuguese it isn't. Explanation goes to Mario in Portuguese
for Mario only, because I am not sure if I can articulate this properly
in English:

[...]
---

So, the whole thing is definitly a thing between the two of you and maybe the work of translating some wikipages and redirect some URL's.

Also I see no Mails from Mario or any other with any disrespectful content, except your mails where you going to tell again and again that there was some. We are going here in circles and as Paul and David pointed out before and I also must agree with: please do not threaten us with something that definitly do not concern The Marketing Mailinglist and the actual Marketing plan. Thanks.



Am 06.05.2010 06:27, schrieb Nelson Marques:
> David,
>
> For expressions like: Above all this flame, it is important to know that
> there is not such a thing as a “correct Portuguese (European)”.
>
> I am expecting public apologies from it's author. Else, I will take
> actions, in this list would be nice also from Mário Torre for refering
> my official language as a dialect. That is a very depreciate comment.
>
>
> nelson
>
>
> On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 20:46 -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>    
>> Nelson: in response to your question of whether or not you should
>> depart. I certainly hope that you don't. I see great potential in some
>> of the work you are doing, and hope to see that flourish. However,
>> Fedora is a community, and the members of that community must respect
>> one another. Moreover I think, there's a technical solution to all of
>> this, that would obviate the disagreement. That being said, continued
>> behavior as seen in this thread, on your part or other's is not
>> tolerable.
>>