Posts from the Planet to the Magazine

[Mike Ruckman]

On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:22:52 -0500
Joe Brockmeier <jzb at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 08:49:37AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 01:31:23AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > > Not sure voting is necessary - if someone is taking point on
> > > this, we should empower them to run with it, IMHO. (And if
> > > there's 2+ excellent posts, why limit things? Re-running all of
> > > Planet would be excessive, but if we find N+1 great posts in a
> > > week and the authors are OK with reposts, then cool by me.)
> > 
> > Honestly, I don't think it'd hurt to rerun all of the
> > directly-Fedora-relevant content from the planet. Possibly this
> > could even be done automatically for people who agree to it and who
> > agree to follow certain rules? I stopped following it regularly
> > because of the amount of non-Fedora content, which is kind of a
> > shame because there _is_ a lot of great Fedora activity that I'm
> > missing.
> 
> Might wind up with quite a lot of content hitting the site that way.
> Might, not sure. 
> 
> But I think we're all agreed: Running some posts from Planet with
> assent from the authors is a good thing. (Yes?) 
> 
> We can start small and work our way up, I think. Is someone prepped to
> run with that?
> 
> Best, 
> 
> jzb

Well, I don't know how "prepped" I am, but it was already on my ToDo
list. I'll find some articles and send them here to the list for
preview - just so we're all on the same page and everyone knows
what kinds of things I was looking at when selecting articles.

That work for starters?

// Roshi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20131030/16895f0c/attachment.sig>