magazine design refresh

[Bryan Sutherland]

How about denoting the audience in the tags? I agree that splitting the
content with categories could end up with both communities missing out on
valid and useful articles.

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:37:57AM -0500, Ryan Lerch wrote:
> > Still not sold on those categories, tbh.
> > Maybe expand it a bit to something like this:
> > * News
> > * Community News
> > * Applications
> > * Five Things
> > * Tips & Tricks
> > Want to try to avoid specifying the audience as a category, rather
> > catergorize the posts on content than audience...
> > sorry if that doesnt make sense :(
>
> It makes sense just fine. I'm just not convinced. :)
>
> Your categories seem good too, but basically the audience question is
> the only reason I can think to really have categories _at all_ rather
> than just tags. We've had several discussions about not wanting to
> overwhelm users with contributor-focused content, but we _do_ have a
> lot of that too, and no where good to put it, and I don't want to
> start a _second_ blog....
>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
> --
> marketing mailing list
> marketing at lists.fedoraproject.org
> List info or to change your subscription:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20150204/6c7448f9/attachment.html>