MeeGo in Fedora 14

[pbrobinson at gmail.com]

On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Chen Lei <supercyper1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/7/1 Adam Miller <maxamillion at fedoraproject.org>:
>> I will be sure to fire up some testing on my netbook in the near future with
>> the netbook UX.
>>
>> I am actually highly interested in the tablet pieces as more and more ARM
>> (and soon Atom) based tablets are rolling out to market. The Fedora ARM port
>> is gaining a bit of steam here lately and I think having a fully functional
>> tablet environment to complment it might help it along as well as muster up
>> some more following for the Fedora Mini efforts in general as Intel pushes
>> their next generation Atom SoC devices.
>>
>> -AdamM (From Android)
>>
>> On Jun 30, 2010 1:56 PM, "Peter Robinson" <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In a follow up to my last commnt it looks like we've got the majority
>> of the OK for the legal side of things. The majority of the core meego
>> 1.0 netbook UX is now in rawhide. Over the next couple of weeks the
>> remainder should be updated.
>>
>> I've been primarily waiting for the legal side of things to push
>> forward and I've been travelling alot over the last 6 weeks since F-13
>> hit, I'm moving house tomorrow and after that it will be full steam
>> ahead.
>>
>> As for 1.0 vs 1.1 I'm currently aiming for 1.0 for F-14 in the short
>> term as I'm not sure how 'open' upstream is going to be but I'll be
>> watching closely and if its at all doable we'll head for 1.1 if it
>> looks to be a reasonable target closer to the time so watch this
>> space.
>>
>> I'm also keeping an eye on the 'tablet' side of things having seen
>> some cool demos online so if your interested in that let me know on
>> the list.
>>
>> Once I have the remainder of the core into rawhide I'm going to start
>> review mini and MeeGo maintainence more so if your interested in
>> helping out open up the discussion on this tread as it seems there's
>> going to more than enough types of meego interfaces to share about :-)
>>
>> Actually I want more discussion on the list.... its been way too quite!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Peter
>
> I intend to package the qt-related packages from meego 1.1 preview
> soon, e.g. qt-mobility.  I think it's safe to start package meego 1.1.
> I'll generate a list about packages in which are still missing in
> fedora.
>
> See
> netbook UX http://repo.meego.com/MeeGo/builds/trunk/1.0.80.8.20100629.1/netbook/images/meego-netbook-ia32/meego-netbook-ia32-1.0.80.8.20100629.1.packages
> handset UX http://repo.moblin.org/MeeGo/builds/trunk/1.0.80.8.20100629.1/handset/images/meego-handset-ia32-netbook-mtf/meego-handset-ia32-netbook-mtf-1.0.80.8.20100629.1.log

Hi Chen,

I already have all the Netbook stuff in hand. If you could deal with
the QT stuff that would be great.

Regards,
Peter