[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765


panemade at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |panemade at gmail.com




------- Additional Comments From panemade at gmail.com  2006-07-06 04:35 EST -------
== Not an official review as I'm not yet sponsored ==
* Mock build for development i386 is sucessfull
 
MUST Items:
     - MUST: rpmlint shows no error 
     - MUST: dist tag is present
     - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
     - MUST: The spec file name matching the base package libical, in the
format libical.spec
      - MUST: This package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
      - MUST: The package is licensed with an open-source compatible license
GPL.
      - MUST: License file COPYING is included in package.
      - MUST: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. md5sum is correct  as 36c80c43940841e53e5a985204851c46.
      - MUST: This package owns all directories that it creates. 
      - MUST: This package did not contain any duplicate files in the %files
listing.
      - MUST: This package  have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT.
      - MUST: This package used macros.
      - MUST: Document files are included like README.txt.
      - MUST: Package did NOT contained any .la libtool archives.
- MUST: Header files are going in a -devel package.
      - MUST: Library files that end in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel
package.
      - MUST: This package contains shared library files located in the dynamic
linker's default paths, and therefore this package is calling ldconfig in %post
and %postun. But Devel package is NOT calling a %post/%postun section that calls
/sbin/ldconfig.
      * Source URL is present and working.
      * BuildRoot is correct BuildRoot:       
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
      * BuildRequires is correct
      * devel package contains  the base package using a fully versioned
dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.