[Bug 197765] Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765


michael at knox.net.nz changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink at leemhuis.info |michael at knox.net.nz
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From michael at knox.net.nz  2006-07-21 01:39 EST -------
Hi.. I will review this package for you.. 

----------------------------------------

Review for release 0.1.aurore:

* Source libical-0.26-6.aurore.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream
* This is the latest version
* Builds fine in mock
* rpmlint of libical-devel looks OK
* rpmlint of libical looks OK
* File list of libical-devel looks OK
* File list of libical looks OK

Needs work:
* Package does not follow Fedora's package naming guildlines
  (wiki: PackageNamingGuidelines)

I am not certain that the release tag is ok. So I will ask on fedora-packaging. 

* The package should contain the text of the license
  (wiki: Packaging/ReviewGuidelines)

The tagball contains a COPYING file. You should add it to the %docs  

Notes:

Looks good. Once I find out about the release tag and the COPYING is included,
it should be all good. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.