[Bug 210025] New: Review Request: openpbx - The truly open source PBX

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210025

           Summary: Review Request: openpbx - The truly open source PBX
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: dwmw2 at redhat.com
         QAContact: fedora-package-review at redhat.com


Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/opbx/openpbx.spec
SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/opbx/openpbx-0-1.svn1912.src.rpm
Description: 
OpenPBX is an Open Source PBX and telephony development platform that
can both replace a conventional PBX and act as a platform for developing
custom telephony applications for delivering dynamic content over a
telephone similarly to how one can deliver dynamic content through a
web browser using CGI and a web server.

OpenPBX talks to a variety of telephony hardware including BRI, PRI,
POTS, Bluetooth headsets and IP telephony clients using SIP and IAX
protocols protocol (e.g. ekiga or kphone).  For more information and a
current list of supported hardware, see www.openpbx.com.


rpmlint complains a lot about non-standard-[ug]id -- obviously I need to add the openpbx user to the UserRegistry at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageUserRegistry

It also complains of lack of documentation for the subpackages, since the documentation is in the _main_ package. And it complains about lack of release version in the changelog entry -- obviously that'll be fixed when it's committed. I'm tracking Subversion in the expectation that there'll be a release any day now, and that's what I'd actually build.

Finally, rpmlint complains of dangling relative symlinks and 'only-non-binary-in-usr-lib' because of the foo.so symlinks in the -devel package. I'm not entirely sure what its problem is there, but I don't see anything wrong. Please advise.

It also complaints of mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs. I use tabs. Except where I need to indent the second and subsequent lines of %config to a column which isn't a multiple of 8, where I use some spaces. That's fine.

Oh, and log-files-without-logrotate in amongst all the noise. Will fix...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.