[Bug 206478] Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Oct 18 11:16:08 UTC 2006
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Yumdiff - Compares RPMS installed on local and remote systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206478
------- Additional Comments From limb at jcomserv.net 2006-10-18 07:16 EST -------
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Lacking a timely response from Ralf,
> Hmm? Note, this package is still in FE_NEW.
> I never started formally reviewing it ;)
>
> > is there anything I can do to move this
> > forward?
> Yes, may-be I had not been clear enough.
>
> IMO, your script in its current shape is non-functional (C.f. comment #7).
> => Bring it to function.
I guess what I'm getting at is that within scope I intended, I've not run into
any problems with this script. In what way does it not function?
> > I'm willing to make improvements, but I need more specific examples
> > in order to make them . . .
> Additional food for thought:
> * What if the remote host uses a different Linux distro?
Yumdiff is only intended to support Fedora, currently.
> * What if the remote host doesn't use rpm or yum?
As all Fedora hosts use rpm, and Yumdiff never calls yum on the remote host, I
don't see a problem here.
> * What if the remote host is not a Linux system at all (Solaris, or even Windows)?
See #1.
>
>
If there are problems or improvements I can make to make this function better
with Fedora, I will. It was never intended to make installed-software
comparisions across distros or OSs, as these comparisons could very well be
meaningless due to differences in software version, package system type, etc.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list