[Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626





------- Additional Comments From mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2006-10-27 20:08 EST -------
(In reply to comment #59)
> (In reply to comment #58)
> (one in documentation is quite funny).

Exactly. "nobody" is really "nobody" at one point......
(In reply to comment #59)
> What makes you think that? The xttpd.init formatting output is 

Well, I just wanted to release this as soon as possible, just ignore it.
I appreciate any comment from you and Michael very much (and of course from
other people).

http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/xtide.spec
http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/xtide-2.9-0.13.dev20061015.src.rpm

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
By the way, I have another question.
I submitted a re-review request as this because it has passed "long" since
xtide got dead, and actually it became to be clear that many changes are
needed as we discussed on this bug.

However in general is there any agreement when we should submit re-review
requests for orphaned/dead packages? I cannot see any reference on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages .
( again I comment that for xtide I really think that re-review was
  needed )

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.