[Bug 211626] Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626





------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2006-10-28 05:22 EST -------
(In reply to comment #61)

> By the way, I have another question.
> I submitted a re-review request as this because it has passed "long" since
> xtide got dead, and actually it became to be clear that many changes are
> needed as we discussed on this bug.

Also many packages from the early days of fedora extras, and from the
days when fedora core package entered in extras without a review don't
attain the same level of quality than more recently reviewed packages.
(and of course the guidelines change over time).

> However in general is there any agreement when we should submit re-review
> requests for orphaned/dead packages? I cannot see any reference on
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages .

I remember that being evoked and I think the rule was that if the package
was marked as dead in a previous release, (it is pretty tight here since
previous release is fc5) it needed a rereview.

> ( again I comment that for xtide I really think that re-review was
>   needed )

Indeed! I guess that a full security audit of xttpd would be nice, however
it would go beyond a review.

If Michael hasn't said anything on monday, you can import it on that day.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.