[Bug 225690] Merge Review: dhcdbd
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 11 17:08:52 UTC 2007
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: dhcdbd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225690
dcantrell at redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED
Flag|needinfo?(dcantrell at redhat.c|
|om) |
------- Additional Comments From dcantrell at redhat.com 2007-06-11 13:08 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> rpmlint output:
> W: dhcdbd macro-in-%changelog post
> W: dhcdbd macro-in-%changelog doc
> E: dhcdbd no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
Fixed.
> macro usage:
> Should Patch0 be specified with %{name}-%{version}-initscript.patch, and the
> same for Patch1?
I would think so, but someone said %{name}-VERSION is preferred because you want
the patch to indicate the version of the software is was made against. So while
you may upgrade to version 3.0 of software foo, the patches against 2.5 may
still apply.
> Requires:
> Remember that we don't like file requires, so you could just Requires(...)
> chkconfig and initscripts. The guidelines say it's allowed as long as the files
> are in /sbin, though. Your call.
Yeah, I picked those up from the packaging guidelines. I'll require the
packages though.
Fixed.
> Scriptlets:
> Be consistent about checking conditions before running the preun and postun
> scriptlets. Right now, they use different forms of the same test.
Fixed.
Changes made to devel branch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the package-review
mailing list