[Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Apr 16 23:53:28 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221


iphands at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |NEW
               Flag|needinfo?(iphands at gmail.com)|




------- Additional Comments From iphands at gmail.com  2008-04-16 19:53 EST -------
Please excuse my absence... I have recently switched email addresses and have
been busy. I do want to continue working on this as I feel this project will be
used by some and it is an easy way for me to contribute to a project that gives
the open source (one that I use, and depend on) alot.

I wonder though; if because review requests are filed as bugs, it would be
better for this to actually be closed and I can resubmit it after I have done
some more work (and have a more time to dedicate to it). Is it bad to have one
open while waiting on a sporadic contributer? Either way I don't mind.

That being said I need to be pointed in the (general) direction of problem or
documentation. I think I really need to go in and mess with the Makefile via the
configure script so that it accepts rpm specific environment variables.

How is the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT passed from rpmbuild to ./configure or make does it
set BASH environment variable? I think the only reason the spec build was
working for me is because I was root and thus stuff was getting installed on the
system instead of in the proper temporary build root.

Sorry if some of my rambling is hard to follow.

Thanks,
-Ian

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list