[Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Feb 5 20:43:05 UTC 2008


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277





------- Additional Comments From mark at fasheh.com  2008-02-05 15:43 EST -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> Change the buildroot to
> 
> %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root

Ahh, ok. Thanks - a new version of the package and spec have been uploaded:

Spec URL: http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oss.oracle.com/~mfasheh/fedora/ocfs2-tools-1.3.9-5.20080131git.fc8.src.rpm


> The part of the guidelines, I wanted you to refer to regarding static libs was, 
> 
> "In general, packagers are strongly encouraged not to ship static libs unless a
> compelling reason exists."
> 
> If you do have compelling reasons, it would be good to specify that in the
> review. 

Upstream doesn't build dynamic libraries because the ocfs2-tools api changes 
quite rapidly as file system features are added / expanded. As a result, it's
impossible to provide any sort of abi stability, so static libraries are
provided instead. Generally, people writing ocfs2 programs are encouraged to
submit their software to ocfs2-tools-devel at oss.oracle.com so that it can be
included in the upstream ocfs2-tools distribution. The libraries that are
provided in ocfs2-tools-devel are intended for interim development, and for a
small number of external programs including some fs test software.


> Other than those minor nit-picks, the latest spec looks ok to me. I did
> a scratch build of the latest ocfs2 srpm and it builds and installs correctly.

Thanks for testing!


> A sponsor has to do a official review and approve your spec before you get
> commit access.
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored

Ok, I will add the FE-NEEDSPONSOR field to indicate my official request for
sponsorship.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the package-review mailing list