[Bug 488105] Review Request: rubygem-htmlentities - A module for encoding and decoding (X)HTML entities

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 4 00:57:26 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488105


Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |oget.fedora at gmail.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |oget.fedora at gmail.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com>  2009-03-03 19:57:24 EDT ---
This is a very simple ruby package. I went through it and didn't find any
problems. But I have a few questions and two little suggestions:

? The other rubygem packages have BR: ruby(rubygems). This one has BR:
rubygems. Why is there a difference? Does it matter? Also BR: ruby(abi) =
%{rubyabi} will be pulled up by BR: rubygems. Do we really need to specify it
specifically? I know the guidelines tell us to do so. But I don't know why.

! The ruby guidelines tell us to use %global instead of %define. While it
doesn't matter much in this case, it would be good to obey the guidelines.

! It would look nicer and consistent if you make the description span evenly
and use the full 80 columns.


Otherwise, the package is good to go:

-------------------------------------------------------
This package (rubygem-htmlentities) is APPROVED by oget
-------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the package-review mailing list