[Bug 488105] Review Request: rubygem-htmlentities - A module for encoding and decoding (X)HTML entities
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 4 00:57:26 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488105
Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-03-03 19:57:24 EDT ---
This is a very simple ruby package. I went through it and didn't find any
problems. But I have a few questions and two little suggestions:
? The other rubygem packages have BR: ruby(rubygems). This one has BR:
rubygems. Why is there a difference? Does it matter? Also BR: ruby(abi) =
%{rubyabi} will be pulled up by BR: rubygems. Do we really need to specify it
specifically? I know the guidelines tell us to do so. But I don't know why.
! The ruby guidelines tell us to use %global instead of %define. While it
doesn't matter much in this case, it would be good to obey the guidelines.
! It would look nicer and consistent if you make the description span evenly
and use the full 80 columns.
Otherwise, the package is good to go:
-------------------------------------------------------
This package (rubygem-htmlentities) is APPROVED by oget
-------------------------------------------------------
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list