[Bug 607778] Review Request: xnoise-plugins-core - Core plugins for xnoise
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jul 4 21:51:31 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=607778
Michel Alexandre Salim <michael.silvanus at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michael.silvanus at gmail.com> 2010-07-04 17:51:30 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: xnoise-plugins-core
Short Description: Core plugins for xnoise
Owners: salimma
Branches: F-12 F-13
InitialCC:
(In reply to comment #5)
> JFTR, the review guidelines say:
>
> | SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as
> | described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
>
Apologies there. The plugins were in working order at some point before 0.1.6
came out, but I still should have not assumed that's still the case with the
released versions. I guess xnoise is still in flux and the plugins lag a bit
behind xnoise itself.
> We could go on with even more disabled plugins. Eventually, no plugin may be
> left. ;) Or old/new segfaults might return with one of the next updates after
> package approval.
>
> Whether 0.1.6 is ready for Rawhide, I leave this decision to you.
It's ready for Rawhide, I guess, but I'd probably keep it there and not push it
to F-12 and F-13 until they are more stable.
>
> [...]
>
> About the .pc file: Consider merging this dubious -devel subpackage into the
> xnoise-plugins-core package. Possibly with a virtual -devel pkg or only when
> you learn about something that would need such a BuildRequires. Rationale:
Good idea; will delete it for now
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list