[Bug 700862] Review Request: wmcalc - Calculator in a WindowMaker dockapp

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jul 18 13:18:01 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700862

Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |limb at jcomserv.net
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |limb at jcomserv.net
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla <limb at jcomserv.net> 2011-07-18 09:17:59 EDT ---
Good:

- rpmlint checks return:

wmcalc.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dockapp -> dock app, dock-app,
paddock
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

Ignore.

wmcalc.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/wmcalc-0.3/COPYING
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled.  Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.

Fix, probably just need a new copy of the file.

wmcalc.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wmcalc
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

Include if available.

2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license ( GPLv2+ ) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 


Fix:  Change license tag to GPLv2+

Question:  Does this or does this not need a .desktop file?

Mock build in progress to double-check BRs.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list