[Bug 707885] Review Request: rubygem-bson - Ruby implementation of BSON
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu May 26 15:39:40 UTC 2011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707885
Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2011-05-26 11:39:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > My fist rubygem review, so be patient.
> >
> > I suppose it's okay to define also other paths in 'gem install' than those
> > stated in guidelines. -> --bindir .%{_bindir}
>
> This avoids struggle with moving binaries and setting execution bits etc, so it
> is the recommended approach.
>
> >
> > You don't own: %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ ,which you should own
> > according guidelines.
>
> I own %{geminstdir} which is the same I hope
>
Should be fixed in packaging guidelines.
>
> >
> > Rpmlint is complaining.
> > rpmlint rubygem-bson-1.3.1-1.fc16.src.rpm
> > rubygem-bson.src: W: invalid-url Source1: bson-tests.tgz
>
> This is custom archive with files necessary to execute the test suite.
>
Ok, but it's ugly.
> > rubygem-bson.noarch: W: no-documentation
>
> Documentation is in subpackage.
>
> > rubygem-bson.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary b2json
> > rubygem-bson.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary j2bson
>
> No manual pages. It is not common for rubygems to contains manual pages :/
resolvedeps-f16 ~/Downloads/rubygem-bson-1.3.1-1.fc16.noarch.rpm
Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list