[Bug 707885] Review Request: rubygem-bson - Ruby implementation of BSON

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu May 26 15:39:40 UTC 2011


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707885

Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano at redhat.com> 2011-05-26 11:39:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > My fist rubygem review, so be patient.
> > 
> > I suppose it's okay to define also other paths in 'gem install' than those
> > stated in guidelines. -> --bindir .%{_bindir}
> 
> This avoids struggle with moving binaries and setting execution bits etc, so it
> is the recommended approach.
> 
> > 
> > You don't own: %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ ,which you should own
> > according guidelines.
> 
> I own %{geminstdir} which is the same I hope
> 
Should be fixed in packaging guidelines.
> 
> > 
> > Rpmlint is complaining.
> > rpmlint rubygem-bson-1.3.1-1.fc16.src.rpm 
> > rubygem-bson.src: W: invalid-url Source1: bson-tests.tgz
> 
> This is custom archive with files necessary to execute the test suite.
> 
Ok, but it's ugly.

> > rubygem-bson.noarch: W: no-documentation
> 
> Documentation is in subpackage.
> 
> > rubygem-bson.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary b2json
> > rubygem-bson.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary j2bson
> 
> No manual pages. It is not common for rubygems to contains manual pages :/

resolvedeps-f16 ~/Downloads/rubygem-bson-1.3.1-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 
Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the package-review mailing list