[Fedora-packaging] Should bash completion and gconf schema files be marked as %config?

[Ankur Sinha]

Hi,

Should files that applications place in /etc/bash_completion.d be marked
as config? 
(From the few packages that I've checked, they shouldn't.)


Should schema files in /etc/gconf/schemas be marked as %config? 
(Some packages mark them: gnome-do[1], revelation[2], some don't:
ekiga[2]).


Since these are both files that admins/users aren't generally expected
to modify, I'd think they don't need to be marked. Is this correct?

[1]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gnome-do.git/tree/gnome-do.spec#n132
[2]
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/revelation.git/tree/revelation.spec#n104
[3] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ekiga.git/tree/ekiga.spec#n143
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20131202/0c6e3904/attachment.sig>