[Fedora-packaging] Should bash completion and gconf schema files be marked as %config?

[Ankur Sinha]

On Mon, 2013-12-02 at 02:28 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> No.  Although they are XML and could be edited, applications can break
> badly if an upgrade's new schema files don't get installed.
> 
> Actually, GConf should have stored them below /usr/share not /etc.

Aye. It's been happening long enough for rpm to even contain scriptlets
pointing to /etc/ though. Thanks for the clarification.
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20131202/24f4fe86/attachment.sig>