[Fedora-packaging] SCL in Fedora

[Marcela Mašláňová]

On 11/01/2013 05:36 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:37:21AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> A prefix is necessary to make the scl packages unique from non-scl packages.
>>>
>>> I did mention that the downstream naming was wrong and would need to be
>>> changed a long time ago.
>>
>> I could find places where you mentioned that it was wrong, but I didn't find any reasoning. Could you please state why you think the downstream naming is wrong?
>>
> Just replied to mmaslano -- I believe I've only mentioned it onlist because
> I discussed it with mmaslano on IRC and with langdon in #scl on freenode
> when doing the initial review of the draft.  Apologies for that, I assumed
> from mmaslano's comments that there was an scl team that was actively
> discussing a prefix (using a vendor) and that she would carry back the
> rationale as to why no prefix wouldn't work.
>
> -Toshio
>
>
>
> --
> packaging mailing list
> packaging at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
>
Yeah, we were discussing some vendor prefix to make a distinction 
between collections with same content and same name. We were thinking 
about user or vendor not general scl.
We are still discussing the best way, because currently redefinition of 
/opt/vendor is not nice. There is needed a fix in scl-utils:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985336

Marcela