[Fedora-packaging] SCL in Fedora

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:58:30PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> Yeah, we were discussing some vendor prefix to make a distinction
> between collections with same content and same name. We were thinking
> about user or vendor not general scl.
> We are still discussing the best way, because currently redefinition
> of /opt/vendor is not nice. There is needed a fix in scl-utils:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=985336
>
the last reply to that bug seems to say that prefixing the package names
with the vendor is the way to go.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20131105/3da8e5cb/attachment.sig>