[Fedora-packaging] scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix

Bohuslav Kabrda bkabrda at redhat.com
Fri Nov 8 07:33:49 UTC 2013


----- Original Message -----
> Le 08/11/2013 08:05, Bohuslav Kabrda a écrit :
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> %_root_prefix = /opt/rh/foo/root
> >> directory own by foo-untime
> >> macro defined by scl-utils (as %_scl_prefix/%sclname/root)
> >>
> > 
> > %_datadir = /usr/share
> > directory owned by filesystem
> > macro defined by rpm
> > 
> > Is this inconsistent too?
> 
> You cannot compare.
> 

Sure I can. The relationship filesystem<->rpm is the same as foo-runtime<->scl-utils

> SCL are very different because of vendor.
> 
> When scl-utils vendor is not the package vendor this inconsitency create
> an issue.

That is solved by redefining _scl_prefix in your own metapackage. I really don't see the problem.

> Remi.
> 
> > 
> >> This is obviously not consistent
> >>
> >> Remi.
> > 

-- 
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.


More information about the packaging mailing list