[Fedora-packaging] scl_prefix vs _scl_prefix
Bohuslav Kabrda
bkabrda at redhat.com
Fri Nov 8 07:33:49 UTC 2013
----- Original Message -----
> Le 08/11/2013 08:05, Bohuslav Kabrda a écrit :
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> %_root_prefix = /opt/rh/foo/root
> >> directory own by foo-untime
> >> macro defined by scl-utils (as %_scl_prefix/%sclname/root)
> >>
> >
> > %_datadir = /usr/share
> > directory owned by filesystem
> > macro defined by rpm
> >
> > Is this inconsistent too?
>
> You cannot compare.
>
Sure I can. The relationship filesystem<->rpm is the same as foo-runtime<->scl-utils
> SCL are very different because of vendor.
>
> When scl-utils vendor is not the package vendor this inconsitency create
> an issue.
That is solved by redefining _scl_prefix in your own metapackage. I really don't see the problem.
> Remi.
>
> >
> >> This is obviously not consistent
> >>
> >> Remi.
> >
--
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
More information about the packaging
mailing list