[Fedora-packaging] Packages approved without satisfied dependencies
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
dominik at greysector.net
Tue Nov 12 12:42:05 UTC 2013
On Tuesday, 12 November 2013 at 12:54, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see more often then I would like that some packages get pushed
> into Fedora and immediately appears among broken dependencies, since
> they were pushed into Fedora sooner then their dependencies.
>
> So I propose to add one additional bullet into reviewer guidelines [1]:
>
> "Package has to have satisfied all its dependencies prior it is approved."
>
> Hopefully somebody will notice next time during review ....
*Sigh* it's another case of something so obvious that nobody thought
it needed to be spelled out before, but apparently it's necessary now,
so +1.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
More information about the packaging
mailing list