Taskotron depcheck question

[Petr Pisar]

On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 09:10:09AM -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:59:44 +0100
> Petr Pisar <ppisar at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > As far as I know alternative-architecture multi-lib packages are
> > distributed in the same repository as packages for the main
> > architectue. E.g. glibc-devel.i686 is in x86_64 repository, hence
> > glibc-devel is mutlilib. glibc-headers.i686 is not in the the x86_64,
> > hence glibc-headers is not multi-lib.
> 
> Yeah, but the thing that's bugging me about this now that I'm digging
> into it more is that miniz-devel.i686 is installable on f20 via dnf and
> yum.
> 
I sent a question why miniz is flagged as multi-lib to the
<rel-eng at lists.fedoraproject.org> and it's waiting on the moderator now. Once
it propagates, I will take down a pointer here.

-- Petr

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 213 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/qa-devel/attachments/20141106/cdf78c8a/attachment.sig>