Bringing GitLab in Fedora

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 11.4.2013 14:00, Axilleas Pipinellis napsal(a):
> On 04/11/2013 01:52 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> There are some of them already undergoing review:
>>
>> awesome_print - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839650
>> backports - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=816991- 
>> though I am not sure if we should continue with this one, since it 
>> brings nothing new to Fedora
>> bootstrap-sass - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=920436
>> faraday - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820063
>> rails_best_practices - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839649
>> ruby-progressbar - There is rubygem-progressbar, which seems to be 
>> the same library: 
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642666there was also 
>> rubygem-ruby-progressbar review: 
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737551- Although this one 
>> was deferred, not sure if we should not name the gem by upstream
>> spork - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588476- This was 
>> deferred
>> stringex - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728051
>> yajl-ruby - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823351- This 
>> is blocked by upstream a bit :/
>>
> Are these listed somewhere, or you manually search for them?

I have saved query in BZ for rubygem- reviews:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/query.cgi?component=Package%20Review&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced&short_desc=rubygem-&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr

Or you can search Fedora's package-review ML.


>> And also, please note that you are listing also the development 
>> dependencies, such as Spork. Spork is no way needed for run-time nor 
>> build-time. It is pure development tool, which allows you to run your 
>> test suite as soon as you save some changes. We should eliminate such 
>> gems from the list. Not that we don't want them in Fedora, but just 
>> because they are out of scope for this project IMO.
>>
>> Vít
>>
> oops, you're right. I'll exclude devel packages as well.
> Nice catch :) I didn't take the Gemfile into account, that's
> why it ended up listing these deps.
>

Some of development packages are needed to run test suite during package 
builds, which is always good idea, so be careful.


Vít
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/attachments/20130411/63be6e58/attachment.html>