package missing dependencies

Ken Dreyer ktdreyer at ktdreyer.com
Mon Mar 11 15:30:54 UTC 2013


On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> wrote:
> Please also note, that if you would specify BR: ruby(release), it would
> never happen that you could build your package in wrong target. May be we
> should clarify it in Guidelines, I am not sure.

+1 to this idea. This would solve the problem of accidentally using
ruby(release) on older releases or EPEL.

- Ken


More information about the ruby-sig mailing list