Fedora 14 does not respect /etc/sysconfig/selinux?

[Eric Warnke]

( Sent this yesterday from the wrong account, didn't make the list )

Nailed it in one.  I guess I had presumed that /etc/sysconfig/selinux was
authoritative.

-rw-r--r--.  1 root root  457 May 11 08:32 selinux
lrwxrwxrwx.  1 root root   17 May 10 08:12 selinux.gres ->
../selinux/config

Looks like I ran sed on the wrong file.


Eric




On 5/11/11 5:37 PM, "Daniel J Walsh" <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On 05/11/2011 04:41 PM, Dominick Grift wrote:
>> On 05/11/2011 04:31 PM, Eric Warnke wrote:
>> 
>>> The problems with corosync are a direct result of the system not
>>> respecting the /etc/sysconfog/selinux directives.
>> 
>> Is /etc/sysconfig/selinux also a symbolic links to /etc/selinux/config
>> on your system?
>> 
>> This is what i see on rawhide:
>> 
>> lrwxrwxrwx. root root system_u:object_r:etc_t:s0       selinux ->
>> ../selinux/config
>> 
>> rpm -qf /etc/sysconfig/selinux
>> selinux-policy-3.9.16-15.fc16.noarch
>> 
>> My fedora 14 configuration seems to not even have a
>> /etc/sysconfig/selinux softlink. Although rpm -qf /etc/sysconfig/selinux
>> does return the selinux-policy package.
>> 
>> What happens if you modify /etc/selinux/config directly?
>> 
>> 
>- --
>selinux mailing list
>selinux at lists.fedoraproject.org
>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
>
>Yes I would suspect you broke the link.  /etc/selinux/config is the
>correct location to modify with /etc/sysconfig/selinux a symbolic link
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
>iEYEARECAAYFAk3LAZcACgkQrlYvE4MpobMlggCg5uZMoZ8ZD56YOl9+TAp8jTvF
>yNgAni/6FMRqAXcF1bm64/xIlkSIMLrN
>=pN7+
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>--
>selinux mailing list
>selinux at lists.fedoraproject.org
>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux