dkim policy in Fedora

[Paul Howarth]

On 09/12/2011 02:14 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 09/09/2011 09:41 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> Currently, the SELinux policy for dkim in Fedora (at least for F-15
>> and Rawhide) is in the milter module, whereas upstream has a
>> separate dkim module. I'm looking at adding support for opendkim (a
>> fork of dkim-milter), which has recently been imported to Fedora,
>> and if I send a patch upstream, it's not going to get pulled into
>> Fedora because Fedora is using a patched milter module rather than
>> upstream's dkim module. Is there any reason for this other than it
>> being a historical thing due to it being in Fedora before
>> upstream?
>>
>> Paul. -- selinux mailing list selinux at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
>
> Lets work to get the Upstream and Fedora code merged.  I have a
> feeling others have worked on the Fedora policy that are using the
> milters all the time, so I think our stuff is good.
>
> dgrift and mgrepl would no better then I.

Shouldn't be a big job anyway.

I'd just posted (upstream) a patch adding support for opendkim, which 
was recently introduced in Fedora, and I'd like to get that merged too.

Paul.