dkim policy in Fedora

[Daniel J Walsh]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/09/2011 09:41 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> Currently, the SELinux policy for dkim in Fedora (at least for F-15
> and Rawhide) is in the milter module, whereas upstream has a
> separate dkim module. I'm looking at adding support for opendkim (a
> fork of dkim-milter), which has recently been imported to Fedora,
> and if I send a patch upstream, it's not going to get pulled into
> Fedora because Fedora is using a patched milter module rather than
> upstream's dkim module. Is there any reason for this other than it
> being a historical thing due to it being in Fedora before
> upstream?
> 
> Paul. -- selinux mailing list selinux at lists.fedoraproject.org 
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux

Lets work to get the Upstream and Fedora code merged.  I have a
feeling others have worked on the Fedora policy that are using the
milters all the time, so I think our stuff is good.

dgrift and mgrepl would no better then I.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5uBa0ACgkQrlYvE4MpobPe6QCgifoGmjZVnBwtllkH7idxmfhB
3tYAoMf2f16E7q2Q9hVMA+TdychfS8mF
=CKkz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----