Thoughts on Fedora Server lifecycle

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 11/11/2013 01:19 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/11/2013 08:04 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 11/11/2013 12:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> I don't think we want to have the preview branch be *exactly*
>>> like Rawhide, though. I think we'd probably want it to follow a
>>> policy similar to "Branched" today where we maintain things for
>>> at least three days in -testing before landing it in the preview
>>> stream. That number of days is certainly up for debate.
>> The server roles as well as the FOSSP needs to be an entire group
>> update that's the only way I see us being able to test and thus
>> cover it.
>>
> Sure, I agree 100% here. One thing I'd like for us to do is to work
> with Luke Macken on defining our needs for Bodhi 2.0 to make this simple.

We need an additional testing layer before update basically group update 
push workflow being something like this ...

Group update pushed to automated test suite ( from there to bodhi 
workflow )--> bodhi update-testing --> bodhi-updates --> bodhi-stable

JBG