Thoughts on Fedora Server lifecycle

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/11/2013 08:35 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> 
> On 11/11/2013 01:19 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On 11/11/2013 08:04 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>> On 11/11/2013 12:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>>> I don't think we want to have the preview branch be
>>>> *exactly* like Rawhide, though. I think we'd probably want it
>>>> to follow a policy similar to "Branched" today where we
>>>> maintain things for at least three days in -testing before
>>>> landing it in the preview stream. That number of days is
>>>> certainly up for debate.
>>> The server roles as well as the FOSSP needs to be an entire
>>> group update that's the only way I see us being able to test
>>> and thus cover it.
>>> 
>> Sure, I agree 100% here. One thing I'd like for us to do is to
>> work with Luke Macken on defining our needs for Bodhi 2.0 to make
>> this simple.
> 
> We need an additional testing layer before update basically group
> update push workflow being something like this ...
> 
> Group update pushed to automated test suite ( from there to bodhi 
> workflow )--> bodhi update-testing --> bodhi-updates -->
> bodhi-stable
> 

I don't understand the differentiation here between bodhi-updates and
bodhi-stable, but other than that I agree that being able to build
some automated testing before creating an errata would be a good thing.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlKA+34ACgkQeiVVYja6o6NjMgCfbhcRIsp9H+yJg6Xcgl+/01g6
HL8AoIxcevKzxcOEnxjmYKgXMpKbbX5E
=DlwK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----