Inconsistency between Server Role Framework and Server Role Changes

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Tue Apr 8 12:41:10 UTC 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/08/2014 07:19 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Hi guys, so the Framework change is done and already announced - I
> talked with Mitr, if guidelines are needed or not, he thinks not.
> But then I took a look on the Server Role Changes (Database, DC)
> and it refers to Framework change guidelines. I already announced
> one of them, don't want to block on it - just, please, make sure
> changes/opinions are consistent and Framework change page is
> updated.
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FrameworkForServerRoleDeployment
>
> 
(I understand this one as linked Server Role infrastructure).
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DatabaseServerRole
> 


Mirek and I discussed this with Jaroslav this morning. We agreed to
add a note about packaging guidelines to the Framework Change Proposal:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes%2FFrameworkForServerRoleDeployment&diff=375707&oldid=375697

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlND7mYACgkQeiVVYja6o6P/gQCeLgFFFL6HvrSaqIiAWsHnf6Ns
PU4AoJmX8Cf4banoSsz2D0YWw61aSUCR
=dqbR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the server mailing list