Beta on Beta: VMware Workstation 7 RC on F12B?
David
dgboles at gmail.com
Mon Oct 26 01:58:34 UTC 2009
On 10/25/2009 9:38 PM, James Cassell wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:34:29 -0400, David <dgboles at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> You do understand just why you got the "negative feedback" about Nvidia
>> correct? Since the code is no OSS they can not fix it or help you.
>
> Of course I understand. It just seemed to me that it was being
> suggested that I put a bug in the fedora bugzilla about the SELinux
> error having to do with VMware, which is why I brought it up.
Fair enough. A misunderstanding.
My guess(es) here would be:
Fedora Bugzilla will not solve anything. The bug will probably just be
closed since it can not be fixed by Fedora.
The SELinux list *might* at least get you enough instructions to write
an 'exception' rule. There is a different name for this but I can recall
it at the moment.
Vmware has their own Bugzilla. I just looked for it. I would think that
there would be the place to report this. I would think that this is a
bug that they would fix. Or at least offer a 'do this' fix for the user
to apply.
Good luck.
--
David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20091025/eeecae96/attachment.bin
More information about the test
mailing list