[Fedora QA] #116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable

[Fedora QA]

#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts
to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  adamwill  |       Owner:  rhe     
      Type:  defect    |      Status:  reopened
  Priority:  major     |   Milestone:          
 Component:  Wiki      |     Version:          
Resolution:            |    Keywords:          
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by adamwill):

 * cc: jlaska (added)

Comment:

 I think we could stand to re-assess the desired behaviour here.

 Rui, James - are you aware of exactly how the installer behaves in all
 conflicting package cases? We have a few things to establish here:

 * What does anaconda do if packages within any of the pre-defined install
 groups have undeclared file conflicts?

 * What does anaconda do if packages within any of the pre-defined install
 groups have declared conflicts (Conflicts: tags)

 * What does anaconda do if you manually select conflicting packages in the
 package selection interface - both declared and undeclared cases?

 I think we should have the answers to those questions before deciding
 exactly what our criteria for conflicting packages on the media ought to
 be...

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/116#comment:4>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance