[Fedora QA] #154: Tracker: critical path test case creation

[Clyde E. Kunkel]

On 12/13/2010 01:28 PM, Fedora QA wrote:
> #154: Tracker: critical path test case creation
> --------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
>    Reporter:  adamwill     |       Owner:  adamwill
>        Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  new
>    Priority:  major        |   Milestone:  Fedora 15
>   Component:  Wiki         |     Version:
> Resolution:               |    Keywords:
> --------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
> Comment (by adamwill):
>
>   here's a draft of a sample test case, for mdadm:
>
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_QA_testcase_mdadm_package_software
>
>   the production name would be QA:Testcase_mdadm_package_software , with
>   QA:Testcase being our standard prefix for test cases (it's not up for
>   debate within the context of this ticket, if we change it we must change
>   it for all test cases), then 'mdadm' being the source package name,
>   'package' indicating this (that it's named based on a src.rpm name -
>   perhaps it should come before the name rather than after?), and 'software'
>   being the name of this particular test (referring to software RAID).
>
>   what does everyone think, particularly of the naming and the
>   categorization? I don't quite feel that this one's nailed down yet, if
>   anyone has smart ideas that'd be great. thanks.
>
  Seems straightforward.  I assume it doesn't make any difference if 
bios raid devices are being used as well as mdadm created devices.

Regards,
OldFart