2011-03-25 - F-15-Beta blocker bug review #3 Recap
Robyn Bergeron
rbergero at redhat.com
Mon Mar 28 15:06:08 UTC 2011
Sorry for the late notes out, folks - apparently I have to be subscribed
to the list for them to be delivered, and I didn't realize I was not
subscribed. Thanks to Mr. Laska for catching this one.
-Robyn
===============================================
#fedora-bugzappers: F-15-Beta Blocker Review #3
===============================================
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-03-25/f-15-beta-blocker.2011-03-25-16.59.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-03-25/f-15-beta-blocker.2011-03-25-16.59.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-03-25/f-15-beta-blocker.2011-03-25-16.59.log.html
Meeting started by rbergeron at 16:59:57 UTC. The full logs are
available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-03-25/f-15-beta-blocker.2011-03-25-16.59.log.html
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll call! (rbergeron, 17:00:17)
* Intro (rbergeron, 17:02:56)
* review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to
accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and n-t-h bugs (rbergeron, 17:03:36)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(rbergeron, 17:03:56)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Beta_Release_Criteria
(rbergeron, 17:04:05)
* LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers
(rbergeron, 17:04:29)
* the [[Current_Release_Blockers]] wiki page has approved, proposed,
approved n-t-h, and proposed n-t-h bugs all listed. (rbergeron,
17:04:59)
* ACTION: tflink to update bz's with info, THANK YOU SIR (rbergeron,
17:07:56)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676821 (rbergeron,
17:08:09)
* 676821 was covered last week, is still in modified, was already
accepted as a final release blocker. (rbergeron, 17:09:59)
* AGREED: 676821 is still accepted as final release blocker, per last
week's meeting (rbergeron, 17:12:01)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676968 (rbergeron,
17:12:30)
* Already accepted last week - we're going to skip the already in
MODIFIED anaconda bugs (rbergeron, 17:13:28)
* hey would usually have got closed already, just because we couldn't
do a compose yet we haven't been able to formally close them off
(rbergeron, 17:13:48)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/678414 (rbergeron, 17:14:44)
* AGREED: 678414 is still a blocker, waiting on feedback from jlaska
(rbergeron, 17:18:55)
* ACTION: jlaska to provide requested info on 678414 (rbergeron,
17:19:07)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/683179 (rbergeron, 17:19:44)
* 683179 fix is in (rbergeron, 17:21:07)
* AGREED: 683179 still a blocker, just waiting on testing, has been
pushed to stable (rbergeron, 17:23:15)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/688306 (rbergeron, 17:23:42)
* 688306 has already been accepted, no movement in the bug though.
(rbergeron, 17:28:22)
* this bug is actually addressed by gnome-settings-daemon-2.91.91-3
but the report has not yet been updated (adamw, 17:29:43)
* AGREED: 688306 remains a blocker, fix is in and bug should be closed
soon (adamw, 17:29:53)
* ACTION: adamw to check on status of the update that fixes 688306 and
update bug status appropriately (adamw, 17:30:05)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/681062 (rbergeron, 17:30:22)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681062
(rbergeron, 17:31:55)
* ACTION: adamw to check on 681062 (rbergeron, 17:32:24)
* AGREED: 681062 still a blocker (rbergeron, 17:32:36)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682141 (rbergeron,
17:32:57)
* new upstream version of gnome-shell landed two days ago, may have
this fix (rbergeron, 17:34:16)
* ACTION: adamw to take a look at git trees and figure it out
(rbergeron, 17:34:33)
* gnome's bz is down (rbergeron, 17:34:37)
* AGREED: 682141 is still a blocker, need to ask people to re-test
with updated gnome-shell (rbergeron, 17:37:15)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677734 (rbergeron,
17:37:30)
* ACTION: adamw to update 677734 because it's supposed to be a final
blocker per the notes (rbergeron, 17:39:03)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679179 (rbergeron,
17:39:22)
* AGREED: 679179 still a blocker, though recommendation is to remove
files; if it is going to interfere with test compose we should note
that and request a fix quickly (rbergeron, 17:44:16)
* adamw talking to dgilmore currently to determine if qemu is on dvd
and would affect TC (rbergeron, 17:44:40)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646843 (rbergeron,
17:44:59)
* 646843 fixed in preupgrade-1.1.9-1, doesn't seem to have been
submitted as an update (rbergeron, 17:47:33)
* AGREED: 646843 still a blocker, action on maintainer to submit fixed
version as an update (adamw, 17:49:06)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679486 (rbergeron,
17:49:20)
* AGREED: 679486 still a blocker, needs testing (rbergeron, 17:51:53)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689291 (rbergeron,
17:52:23)
* AGREED: 689291 neds to ask if it happens in a non-ipv6 config, and
with new NM (rbergeron, 17:59:26)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679783 (rbergeron,
17:59:49)
* AGREED: 679783 seems to be un-reproducible by skvidal, geppetto and
adamw, looks like a transient cache issue, agreed not blocker or nth
for now; reporter can re-propose if new info transpires (adamw,
18:12:03)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689779 (rbergeron,
18:12:22)
* AGREED: 689779 can be closed, no longer a problem (rbergeron,
18:14:26)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689268 (rbergeron,
18:14:43)
* there is already an update that can be pulled in for 689268
(rbergeron, 18:15:19)
* AGREED: 689268 Accepted Blocker, update looks good, waiting for it
to hit stable (rbergeron, 18:23:41)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689260 (rbergeron,
18:24:09)
* AGREED: 689260 Accepted Final Blocker, Beta NTH, per final release
criterion #11, apps in apps menu need to withstand a basic
funcationality test and not crash after a few minutes of normal use
(rbergeron, 18:28:55)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678927 (rbergeron,
18:29:41)
* AGREED: 678927 keep monitoring for more information (rbergeron,
18:33:15)
* lennart has been out on PTO this week (rbergeron, 18:33:26)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683835 (rbergeron,
18:33:50)
* AGREED: 683835 is a dupe of 678927 (rbergeron, 18:35:16)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689090 (rbergeron,
18:35:46)
* AGREED: 689090 -1 blocker, -1 nth unless testing shows that it DOES
affect the installer rescue mode (rbergeron, 18:45:50)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688587 (rbergeron,
18:48:01)
* AGREED: 688587 -1 NTH, subtitles not working doesn't fit NTH
(rbergeron, 18:50:40)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673824 (rbergeron,
18:50:57)
* was previously rejected as NTH, but has new use cases added, and has
an update that needs testing and karma. (rbergeron, 18:51:49)
* AGREED: 673824 Accepted NTH, update needs testing and karma
(rbergeron, 18:53:13)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=629311 (rbergeron,
18:53:52)
* not actually going to review the Accepted NTHs, becusae they'ave
already been accepted, but are just nice to have and not ZOMG if
they don't get fixed (rbergeron, 18:55:39)
* Any other business? (rbergeron, 18:56:04)
Meeting ended at 18:57:00 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* tflink to update bz's with info, THANK YOU SIR
* jlaska to provide requested info on 678414
* adamw to check on status of the update that fixes 688306 and update
bug status appropriately
* adamw to check on 681062
* adamw to take a look at git trees and figure it out
* adamw to update 677734 because it's supposed to be a final blocker per
the notes
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* adamw
* adamw to check on status of the update that fixes 688306 and update
bug status appropriately
* adamw to check on 681062
* adamw to take a look at git trees and figure it out
* adamw to update 677734 because it's supposed to be a final blocker
per the notes
* tflink
* tflink to update bz's with info, THANK YOU SIR
* **UNASSIGNED**
* jlaska to provide requested info on 678414
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* rbergeron (251)
* adamw (155)
* tflink (79)
* Viking-rawhide (29)
* brunowolff (23)
* 15SAAC8I0 (22)
* jsmith (11)
* skvidal (9)
* zodbot (8)
* nirik (2)
* rjune (2)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
More information about the test
mailing list