Proposed release criteria revisions

[Adam Williamson]

On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 09:13 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 08:41 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 00:40:07 -0700,
> >   Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > I agree 'supported' isn't quite the right word, but I think we need some
> > > kind of adjective there. I'll try and think of something better.
> > 
> > Something needs to be said there, as otherwise people will wonder why only
> > some of the desktop spins are listed. "Supported" is close to what we mean,
> > but the intended nuance might be confusing given what people may assume
> > about the what kind of support is implied. But nothing else specific comes
> > to mind as a better word.
> 
> Provided?

No, because we 'provide' many more desktops than just GNOME and KDE. The
point is that _only_ those two can currently block releases.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net