fsck.btrfs? (Was Re: Feedback needed : Fedora 15 Announcement)
awilliam at redhat.com
Fri May 20 17:03:29 UTC 2011
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 11:08 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 05/20/2011 10:57 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > Also, given the triviality that you point out a patch in the bug wouldn't go
> > amiss I'm sure (fwiw e2fsprogs uses hardlinks for these files and dosfstools
> > uses symlinks).
> Yeah, but it would be a one-line patch to the SPEC file. It seems like
> it would actually be more work for the package maintainer to process the
> patch than to simply go in and add the ln command.
With the awesomeness of git-format-patch, probably not =) It's good to
get into the habit of providing spec fixes as git-formatted patches
these days, it makes it very easy on the maintainer - they can apply it
with a one-liner.
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
More information about the test