Some notes from fallback mode

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 16:01 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 15:48, Adam Jackson <ajax at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 15:43 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> >> On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 23:05:28 +0200
> >> Michael Schwendt <mschwendt at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > IMO, it could be much more productive if you also
> >> > evaluated Fedora 16 development instead of Fedora 17 development.
> >>
> >> Sigh.
> >>
> >> I've been running Rawhide for a very long time.  As of the last year or
> >> so, though, almost every post I make draws a response like this.
> >
> > I encourage you to ignore responses like this.  Rawhide needs to be
> > consumable.
> >
> 
> I would also like to see how we can FIX this better after Fedora 16 is
> out the door. If it takes someone to be the rawhide wrangler who makes
> sure that breakages get looked even when people are playing tiddly
> winks with latest.. then we should look at it.

Congratulations!

*presents smooge with Rawhide wrangler hat*
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net