First experience with F18-ALPHA-TC1
Adam Jackson
ajax at redhat.com
Wed Aug 15 15:09:04 UTC 2012
On 8/15/12 9:42 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> It would be far more honest to just call this alpha 1.
>
> Sorry, I don't get it - is the problem calling Alpha gold, as it's
> definitely not gold final release.
Calling alpha "gold" is a problem, sure.
Calling test composes something with "alpha" in the name is also a problem.
OLPC's "Atest" "Btest" pattern was fairly nice for this.
- ajax
More information about the test
mailing list