First experience with F18-ALPHA-TC1

Adam Jackson ajax at redhat.com
Wed Aug 15 15:09:04 UTC 2012


On 8/15/12 9:42 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:

>> It would be far more honest to just call this alpha 1.
>
> Sorry, I don't get it - is the problem calling Alpha gold, as it's
> definitely not gold final release.

Calling alpha "gold" is a problem, sure.

Calling test composes something with "alpha" in the name is also a problem.

OLPC's "Atest" "Btest" pattern was fairly nice for this.

- ajax


More information about the test mailing list